Message 264018 - Python tracker
Message264018
| Author | vstinner |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Yury.Selivanov, casevh, josh.r, lemburg, mark.dickinson, pitrou, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, skrah, vstinner, yselivanov, zbyrne |
| Date | 2016-04-22.14:05:45 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1461333945.44.0.88161417026.issue21955@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Maybe we should adopt a difference approach. There is something called "inline caching": put the cache between instructions, in the same memory block. Example of paper on CPython: "Efficient Inline Caching without Dynamic Translation" by Stefan Brunthaler (2009) https://www.sba-research.org/wp-content/uploads/publications/sac10.pdf Maybe we can build something on top of the issue #26219 "implement per-opcode cache in ceval"? |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2016-04-22 14:05:46 | vstinner | set | recipients: + vstinner, lemburg, rhettinger, mark.dickinson, pitrou, casevh, skrah, Yury.Selivanov, serhiy.storchaka, yselivanov, josh.r, zbyrne |
| 2016-04-22 14:05:45 | vstinner | set | messageid: <1461333945.44.0.88161417026.issue21955@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2016-04-22 14:05:45 | vstinner | link | issue21955 messages |
| 2016-04-22 14:05:45 | vstinner | create | |