Message 282385 - Python tracker
Message282385
| Author | serhiy.storchaka |
|---|---|
| Recipients | python-dev, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner |
| Date | 2016-12-05.06:06:16 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1480917977.2.0.329959927709.issue28858@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
That was my initial preference. Mainly because this doesn't add code churn. But I don't understand how PyObject_CallFunctionObjArgs() that uses _PyObject_CallArg1() and has many local variables can consume less stack than _PyObject_CallArg1() itself. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2016-12-05 06:06:17 | serhiy.storchaka | set | recipients: + serhiy.storchaka, vstinner, python-dev |
| 2016-12-05 06:06:17 | serhiy.storchaka | set | messageid: <1480917977.2.0.329959927709.issue28858@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2016-12-05 06:06:17 | serhiy.storchaka | link | issue28858 messages |
| 2016-12-05 06:06:16 | serhiy.storchaka | create | |