On 24.10.2017 11:23, STINNER Victor wrote:
>
> Marc-Andre Lemburg: "Thanks for pointing that out. I didn't know."
>
> Do you still think that we need to modify time.clock() rather than deprecating it?
Yes, to avoid yet another Python 2/3 difference. It should be
replaced with the appropriate variant on Windows
and non-Windows platforms. From Serhiy's response that's
time.process_time() on non-Windows platforms and time.perf_counter()
on Windows.
The documentation can point to the new functions and recommend
these over time.clock().