While working on https://bugs.python.org/issue33042, I found it hard to keep track of which kind of config struct a particular piece of code was referencing.
As a particularly relevant example, we currently have 3 different "warnoptions" fields: the private-to-main one for reading the command line settings, the "wchar_t *" list in the core config, and the "PyObject *" list object in the main interpreter config (which is also the one aliased as sys.warnoptions).
What do you think of adopting a convention where:
* the command line fields all gain a "cmd_" prefix
* the core config fields all gain a "c_" prefix
* the interpreter config fields all gain a "py_" prefix
We'd then have "cmd_warnoptions", "c_warnoptions", and "py_warnoptions" as the field names, and it would be more self-evident which layer we were working at in any particular piece of code.