> I don't think this will need drastic changes.
IIRC LOAD_NAME loads from the *local* scope, which will be the synthetic
function created for the comprehension (whose scope contains the loop
control variables). We may need a new opcode similar to LOAD_GLOBAL that
looks in two non-local directories rather than just one before falling back
to builtins; and the function object would need to have a link to both the
class dict and the global dict -- currently function objects gave a
__globals__ link but there's no chaining. Or perhaps __globals__ could be
set to a chainmap referencing the class dict and the globals?