Message 389340 - Python tracker

Message389340

Author	gvanrossum
Recipients	BTaskaya, Mark.Shannon, gvanrossum, rhettinger, v2m
Date	2021-03-22.20:49:58
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1616446198.17.0.75955255624.issue43563@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to

Content
This looks like a sensible idea to me. The safeguards to ensure that customized 'super' still works seem reasonable to me. I have to admit that I sometimes refrain from using super() where I should because of the expense, so this would be welcome. I do wonder -- is two-arg super() important enough to support it at all? Maybe the code would be somewhat simpler if the special opcodes were only generated for zero-arg super() calls.

Content

This looks like a sensible idea to me. The safeguards to ensure that customized 'super' still works seem reasonable to me. I have to admit that I sometimes refrain from using super() where I should because of the expense, so this would be welcome.

I do wonder -- is two-arg super() important enough to support it at all? Maybe the code would be somewhat simpler if the special opcodes were only generated for zero-arg super() calls.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2021-03-22 20:49:58	gvanrossum	set	recipients: + gvanrossum, rhettinger, Mark.Shannon, v2m, BTaskaya
2021-03-22 20:49:58	gvanrossum	set	messageid: <1616446198.17.0.75955255624.issue43563@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2021-03-22 20:49:58	gvanrossum	link	issue43563 messages
2021-03-22 20:49:58	gvanrossum	create