Message 402296 - Python tracker

Like what Ma Lin and neonene have mentioned above, PR28475 recovered half of the lost performance. It's unfortunately still 4% slower than 3.10a7.

>pyperf compare_to 310a7.json 310rc2.json 310rc2patched.json

Geometric mean (versus 3.10a7)
==============

310rc2: 1.09x slower
310rc2patched: 1.04x slower

Attached pyperf benchmark comparisons file.