Message 403544 - Python tracker
Message403544
| Author | vstinner |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Livius, akira, python-dev, shankarunni, vstinner, yselivanov |
| Date | 2021-10-09.17:06:14 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1633799174.34.0.904632593417.issue21302@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> it is time to use nicely GetSystemTimePreciseAsFileTime() in time.time() See bpo-19007 for that. > it is time to (...) time.sleep() as absolute sleeping because it is available since Windows 8. In Python 3.11, time.sleep() is now always implemented with a waitable timer. I chose to use a relative timeout since it's simpler to implement. Is there any benefit of calling SetWaitableTimer() with an absolute timeout, compared to calling it with a relative timeout? |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2021-10-09 17:06:14 | vstinner | set | recipients: + vstinner, akira, python-dev, yselivanov, shankarunni, Livius |
| 2021-10-09 17:06:14 | vstinner | set | messageid: <1633799174.34.0.904632593417.issue21302@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2021-10-09 17:06:14 | vstinner | link | issue21302 messages |
| 2021-10-09 17:06:14 | vstinner | create | |