Message 416633 - Python tracker
Message416633
| Author | orsenthil |
|---|---|
| Recipients | eric.araujo, ethan.furman, karlcow, lincolnauster, lukasz.langa, orsenthil |
| Date | 2022-04-03.17:36:07 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1649007367.4.0.394409805182.issue46337@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Hi all, I was looking at it. Introducing an enum at the last parameter is going to add cost of understanding the behavior to this function. I am doing further reading on the previous discussions and PR(s) now. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2022-04-03 17:36:07 | orsenthil | set | recipients: + orsenthil, eric.araujo, karlcow, ethan.furman, lukasz.langa, lincolnauster |
| 2022-04-03 17:36:07 | orsenthil | set | messageid: <1649007367.4.0.394409805182.issue46337@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2022-04-03 17:36:07 | orsenthil | link | issue46337 messages |
| 2022-04-03 17:36:07 | orsenthil | create | |