Update `test_pep646_syntax` from v3.14.2 by fanninpm · Pull Request #6928 · RustPython/RustPython
📝 Walkthrough
Walkthrough
A single line is added to the CI workflow configuration to include test_pep646_syntax in the test suite, expanding the tests executed during continuous integration for PEP 646 syntax validation.
Changes
| Cohort / File(s) | Summary |
|---|---|
CI Configuration .github/workflows/ci.yaml |
Added test_pep646_syntax to test lists in both PLATFORM_INDEPENDENT_TESTS and the top-level env test group. |
Estimated code review effort
🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes
Suggested reviewers
- youknowone
Poem
A test for syntax, PEP 646's way, 🐰
Now runs through CI, come what may,
One line added, workflows gleam bright,
Our checks grow stronger with each flight! ✨
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
| Check name | Status | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| Description Check | ✅ Passed | Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled. |
| Title check | ✅ Passed | The title describes updating test_pep646_syntax from v3.14.2, which directly matches the main objective of adding this test to the CI environment and marking it as platform-independent. |
| Docstring Coverage | ✅ Passed | No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. |
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
- Create PR with unit tests
- Post copyable unit tests in a comment
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.
Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.