handle type annotations in nested functions correctly by elmjag · Pull Request #7072 · RustPython/RustPython

Bot reviewed Feb 10, 2026

For example in the following code:

    def foo(x: int, y: float):
        def bar(q: int):
            return q
        pass

Make sure that `foo` type annotations are correctly propogated to
it's `__annotate__` and `__annotations__` attributes.

With this chage, we'll get:

    >>>>> foo.__annotations__
    {'x': <class 'int'>, 'y': <class 'float'>}

Previously annotations where 'lost', and we would get:

    >>>>> foo.__annotations__
    {}

elmjag deleted the nested-funcs-annotations branch

youknowone pushed a commit to youknowone/RustPython that referenced this pull request

For example in the following code:

    def foo(x: int, y: float):
        def bar(q: int):
            return q
        pass

Make sure that `foo` type annotations are correctly propogated to
it's `__annotate__` and `__annotations__` attributes.

With this chage, we'll get:

    >>>>> foo.__annotations__
    {'x': <class 'int'>, 'y': <class 'float'>}

Previously annotations where 'lost', and we would get:

    >>>>> foo.__annotations__
    {}