test: add non-internet resolveAny tests by addaleax · Pull Request #13883 · nodejs/node
Original commit message:
ares_parse_naptr_reply: make buffer length check more accurate
9478908a490a6bf009ba58d81de8c1d06d50a117 introduced a length check
for records parsed by `ares_parse_naptr_reply()`. However, that
function is designed to parse replies which also contain non-NAPTR
records; for A records, the `rr_len > 7` check will fail as there
are only 4 bytes of payload.
In particular, parsing ANY replies for NAPTR records was broken
by that patch.
Fix that by moving the check into the case in which it is already
known that the record is a NAPTR record.
Ref: c-ares/c-ares@18ea996
This is a bit of a check to see how people feel about having this kind of test. Ref: nodejs#13137 PR-URL: nodejs#13883 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com>
addaleax added a commit that referenced this pull request
Original commit message:
ares_parse_naptr_reply: make buffer length check more accurate
9478908a490a6bf009ba58d81de8c1d06d50a117 introduced a length check
for records parsed by `ares_parse_naptr_reply()`. However, that
function is designed to parse replies which also contain non-NAPTR
records; for A records, the `rr_len > 7` check will fail as there
are only 4 bytes of payload.
In particular, parsing ANY replies for NAPTR records was broken
by that patch.
Fix that by moving the check into the case in which it is already
known that the record is a NAPTR record.
Ref: c-ares/c-ares@18ea996
PR-URL: #13883
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
addaleax added a commit that referenced this pull request
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request
Original commit message:
ares_parse_naptr_reply: make buffer length check more accurate
9478908a490a6bf009ba58d81de8c1d06d50a117 introduced a length check
for records parsed by `ares_parse_naptr_reply()`. However, that
function is designed to parse replies which also contain non-NAPTR
records; for A records, the `rr_len > 7` check will fail as there
are only 4 bytes of payload.
In particular, parsing ANY replies for NAPTR records was broken
by that patch.
Fix that by moving the check into the case in which it is already
known that the record is a NAPTR record.
Ref: c-ares/c-ares@18ea996
PR-URL: #13883
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request
Original commit message:
ares_parse_naptr_reply: make buffer length check more accurate
9478908a490a6bf009ba58d81de8c1d06d50a117 introduced a length check
for records parsed by `ares_parse_naptr_reply()`. However, that
function is designed to parse replies which also contain non-NAPTR
records; for A records, the `rr_len > 7` check will fail as there
are only 4 bytes of payload.
In particular, parsing ANY replies for NAPTR records was broken
by that patch.
Fix that by moving the check into the case in which it is already
known that the record is a NAPTR record.
Ref: c-ares/c-ares@18ea996
PR-URL: #13883
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request
Original commit message:
ares_parse_naptr_reply: make buffer length check more accurate
9478908a490a6bf009ba58d81de8c1d06d50a117 introduced a length check
for records parsed by `ares_parse_naptr_reply()`. However, that
function is designed to parse replies which also contain non-NAPTR
records; for A records, the `rr_len > 7` check will fail as there
are only 4 bytes of payload.
In particular, parsing ANY replies for NAPTR records was broken
by that patch.
Fix that by moving the check into the case in which it is already
known that the record is a NAPTR record.
Ref: c-ares/c-ares@18ea996
PR-URL: #13883
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request
Original commit message:
ares_parse_naptr_reply: make buffer length check more accurate
9478908a490a6bf009ba58d81de8c1d06d50a117 introduced a length check
for records parsed by `ares_parse_naptr_reply()`. However, that
function is designed to parse replies which also contain non-NAPTR
records; for A records, the `rr_len > 7` check will fail as there
are only 4 bytes of payload.
In particular, parsing ANY replies for NAPTR records was broken
by that patch.
Fix that by moving the check into the case in which it is already
known that the record is a NAPTR record.
Ref: c-ares/c-ares@18ea996
PR-URL: #13883
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request
Original commit message:
ares_parse_naptr_reply: make buffer length check more accurate
9478908a490a6bf009ba58d81de8c1d06d50a117 introduced a length check
for records parsed by `ares_parse_naptr_reply()`. However, that
function is designed to parse replies which also contain non-NAPTR
records; for A records, the `rr_len > 7` check will fail as there
are only 4 bytes of payload.
In particular, parsing ANY replies for NAPTR records was broken
by that patch.
Fix that by moving the check into the case in which it is already
known that the record is a NAPTR record.
Ref: c-ares/c-ares@18ea996
PR-URL: #13883
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
This was referenced
rvagg
mentioned this pull request
rvagg pushed a commit to rvagg/io.js that referenced this pull request
Original commit message:
ares_parse_naptr_reply: make buffer length check more accurate
9478908a490a6bf009ba58d81de8c1d06d50a117 introduced a length check
for records parsed by `ares_parse_naptr_reply()`. However, that
function is designed to parse replies which also contain non-NAPTR
records; for A records, the `rr_len > 7` check will fail as there
are only 4 bytes of payload.
In particular, parsing ANY replies for NAPTR records was broken
by that patch.
Fix that by moving the check into the case in which it is already
known that the record is a NAPTR record.
Ref: c-ares/c-ares@18ea996
PR-URL: nodejs#13883
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
BridgeAR pushed a commit that referenced this pull request
Original commit message:
ares_parse_naptr_reply: make buffer length check more accurate
9478908a490a6bf009ba58d81de8c1d06d50a117 introduced a length check
for records parsed by `ares_parse_naptr_reply()`. However, that
function is designed to parse replies which also contain non-NAPTR
records; for A records, the `rr_len > 7` check will fail as there
are only 4 bytes of payload.
In particular, parsing ANY replies for NAPTR records was broken
by that patch.
Fix that by moving the check into the case in which it is already
known that the record is a NAPTR record.
Ref: c-ares/c-ares@18ea996
PR-URL: #13883
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
addaleax added a commit to addaleax/ayo that referenced this pull request
Original commit message:
ares_parse_naptr_reply: make buffer length check more accurate
9478908a490a6bf009ba58d81de8c1d06d50a117 introduced a length check
for records parsed by `ares_parse_naptr_reply()`. However, that
function is designed to parse replies which also contain non-NAPTR
records; for A records, the `rr_len > 7` check will fail as there
are only 4 bytes of payload.
In particular, parsing ANY replies for NAPTR records was broken
by that patch.
Fix that by moving the check into the case in which it is already
known that the record is a NAPTR record.
Ref: c-ares/c-ares@18ea996
PR-URL: nodejs/node#13883
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request
Original commit message:
ares_parse_naptr_reply: make buffer length check more accurate
9478908a490a6bf009ba58d81de8c1d06d50a117 introduced a length check
for records parsed by `ares_parse_naptr_reply()`. However, that
function is designed to parse replies which also contain non-NAPTR
records; for A records, the `rr_len > 7` check will fail as there
are only 4 bytes of payload.
In particular, parsing ANY replies for NAPTR records was broken
by that patch.
Fix that by moving the check into the case in which it is already
known that the record is a NAPTR record.
Ref: c-ares/c-ares@18ea996
PR-URL: #13883
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>