gh-102192: Replace PyErr_Fetch/Restore etc by more efficient alternatives (in Python/) by iritkatriel · Pull Request #102193 · python/cpython
Skipping news because these are internal-only changes, and the fact of PyErr_Fetch/Restore being obsolete is already in the news.
🤖 New build scheduled with the buildbot fleet by @iritkatriel for commit 9abebe0 🤖
If you want to schedule another build, you need to add the 🔨 test-with-buildbots label again.
iritkatriel
changed the title
gh-102192: Replace PyErr_Fetch/Restore etc by more efficient alternatives
gh-102192: Replace PyErr_Fetch/Restore etc by more efficient alternatives (Objects/ and Python/)
iritkatriel
changed the title
gh-102192: Replace PyErr_Fetch/Restore etc by more efficient alternatives (Objects/ and Python/)
gh-102192: Replace PyErr_Fetch/Restore etc by more efficient alternatives (in Python/)
🤖 New build scheduled with the buildbot fleet by @iritkatriel for commit 603922d 🤖
If you want to schedule another build, you need to add the 🔨 test-with-buildbots label again.
🤖 New build scheduled with the buildbot fleet by @iritkatriel for commit df86e20 🤖
If you want to schedule another build, you need to add the 🔨 test-with-buildbots label again.
🤖 New build scheduled with the buildbot fleet by @iritkatriel for commit f29ca0b 🤖
If you want to schedule another build, you need to add the 🔨 test-with-refleak-buildbots label again.
There's only one failure now, in an AMD64 RHEL7 builedbot which has been flaky for a couple of months. I'll call it a pass.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
One minor edit needed, otherwise LGTM.
When you're done making the requested changes, leave the comment: I have made the requested changes; please review again.