gh-103124: Multiline statement support for pdb by gaogaotiantian · Pull Request #103125 · python/cpython
-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 34.7k
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Member
This fails one test now - the one that expects
(Pdb) print(
to fail directly. That's a behavior that the feature changes, so if we want to have this feature, we need to change the test.
gaogaotiantian added 2 commits
label
arhadthedev
commented
Mar 30, 2023
arhadthedev commented
Member
@iritkatriel @ambv as mergers of related gh-101674 and gh-103024.
gaogaotiantian and others added 2 commits
brandtbucher
left a comment
Member
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm really excited to see this in 3.13! I'm just having a little trouble following the new logic (I believe you that it's correct, though):
25a64fd
into
python:main
carljm added a commit to carljm/cpython that referenced this pull request
* main: pythongh-104799: PEP 695 backward compatibility for ast.unparse (python#105846) pythongh-105834: Add tests for calling `issubclass()` between two protocols (python#105835) CI: Remove docs build from Azure Pipelines (python#105823) pythongh-105844: Consistently use 'minor version' for X.Y versions (python#105851) Fix inaccuracies in "Assorted Topics" section of "Defining Extension Types" tutorial (python#104969) pythongh-105433: Add `pickle` tests for PEP695 (python#105443) bpo-44530: Document the change in MAKE_FUNCTION behavior (python#93189) pythonGH-103124: Multiline statement support for pdb (pythonGH-103125) pythonGH-105588: Add missing error checks to some obj2ast_* converters (pythonGH-105589)
gvanrossum pushed a commit to gvanrossum/cpython that referenced this pull request
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
