Improve assert_type phrasing by hauntsaninja · Pull Request #104081 · python/cpython
I'd like to make the fact that this does nothing at runtime really obvious, since I suspect this is unintuitive for users who are unfamiliar with static type checking. I thought of this because of https://discuss.python.org/t/add-arg-check-type-to-types/26384 wherein I'm skeptical that the user really did want `assert_type`.
miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request
I'd like to make the fact that this does nothing at runtime really obvious, since I suspect this is unintuitive for users who are unfamiliar with static type checking. I thought of this because of https://discuss.python.org/t/add-arg-check-type-to-types/26384 wherein I'm skeptical that the user really did want `assert_type`. (cherry picked from commit 82ba6ce) Co-authored-by: Shantanu <12621235+hauntsaninja@users.noreply.github.com>
AlexWaygood pushed a commit that referenced this pull request
Improve assert_type phrasing (GH-104081) I'd like to make the fact that this does nothing at runtime really obvious, since I suspect this is unintuitive for users who are unfamiliar with static type checking. I thought of this because of https://discuss.python.org/t/add-arg-check-type-to-types/26384 wherein I'm skeptical that the user really did want `assert_type`. (cherry picked from commit 82ba6ce) Co-authored-by: Shantanu <12621235+hauntsaninja@users.noreply.github.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters