`functools.partial` docs: Use the more common spelling for "referenceable" by rodrigogiraoserrao · Pull Request #113675 · python/cpython
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Both are acceptable spellings, but "referenceable" is the more common one, and does look more natural to my eyes. So I'm happy for this to go in :)
AlexWaygood
changed the title
Fix typo in docs about
partial objectsfunctools.partial docs: Use the more common spelling for "referenceable"
miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request
…able" (pythonGH-113675) (cherry picked from commit 4de468c) Co-authored-by: Rodrigo Girão Serrão <5621605+rodrigogiraoserrao@users.noreply.github.com>
miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request
…able" (pythonGH-113675) (cherry picked from commit 4de468c) Co-authored-by: Rodrigo Girão Serrão <5621605+rodrigogiraoserrao@users.noreply.github.com>
Both are acceptable spellings, but "referenceable" is the more common one, and does look more natural to my eyes. So I'm happy for this to go in :)
We also have at least three similar situations: c-api/weakref.rst (38 and 50 lines) and newtypes.rst (548 line). Should we fix it?
AlexWaygood pushed a commit that referenced this pull request
AlexWaygood pushed a commit that referenced this pull request
We also have at least three similar situations:
c-api/weakref.rst(38 and 50 lines) andnewtypes.rst(548 line). Should we fix it?
If you make a PR, I'll probably merge it -- but also, I wouldn't say it's a priority, since both are acceptable spellings :)