gh-119180: Update the magic number by JelleZijlstra · Pull Request #119397 · python/cpython
Conversation
but did not actually apply the new magic number.
a1 is right; the change is expected to be released in a1. You can see a little further up that there were numerous changes listed as 3.13a1 but none for 3.13a0.
a1 is right; the change is expected to be released in a1. You can see a little further up that there were numerous changes listed as 3.13a1 but none for 3.13a0.
I was confused by an older entries where's a0 is used:
| # Python 3.9a0 3420 (add LOAD_ASSERTION_ERROR #34880) | |
| # Python 3.9a0 3421 (simplified bytecode for with blocks #32949) | |
| # Python 3.9a0 3422 (remove BEGIN_FINALLY, END_FINALLY, CALL_FINALLY, POP_FINALLY bytecodes #33387) |
It seems that the policy has changed since then?
estyxx pushed a commit to estyxx/cpython that referenced this pull request
PR python#119321 added a comment about the magic number bump but did not actually apply the new magic number.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Labels
2 participants
