◐ Shell
clean mode source ↗

bpo-23894: Make rb'' strings work in lib2to3 by ambv · Pull Request #1724 · python/cpython

@ambv

This partially solves bpo-23894. A separate PR coming later to support f-strings.

@ambv ambv changed the title Make rb'' strings work in lib2to3 bpo-23894: Make rb'' strings work in lib2to3

May 22, 2017

ambv

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"String" didn't previously include b but this is suspicious to me. Why wouldn't it? That way b'' literals were only PseudoTokens (via ContStr), not actual Tokens (via String).

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LG

ned-deily

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for adding the test: LGTM. As far as the tokenizer changes, I'm not familiar enough with lib2to3 to provide a useful review. Assuming other reviewers have no objections, I'm fine for this going into 3.6.2rc.

@ambv

Tests are failing because I used an f-string in the test and lib2to3 is parsing that test file as part of fixers. f-strings are not supported yet in lib2to3. Switching to using a classic str.format fixes it. I'm updating the PR now.

UPDATE: as expected, tests pass now.

This partially solves bpo-23894.

ambv added a commit to ambv/cpython that referenced this pull request

May 22, 2017
This partially solves bpo-23894.
(cherry picked from commit 0c4aca5)

ambv added a commit that referenced this pull request

May 22, 2017

@vstinner

I was requested for a review, but after I completed my review, I see that the change was already merged :-D It's fine, don't worry. I just want to give my post-commit LGTM! Nice change. Thanks @ambv for taking care of 2to3 ;-)

@ambv ambv deleted the bpo-23894-rb branch

July 12, 2021 11:22