◐ Shell
clean mode source ↗

bpo-33387: update documentation for exception handling opcode changes by iritkatriel · Pull Request #24334 · python/cpython

iritkatriel

Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in

Appearance settings

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up

Appearance settings

Conversation

@iritkatriel

@iritkatriel iritkatriel commented

Jan 25, 2021

•

edited by bedevere-bot

Loading

Copy link Copy Markdown

Member

@markshannon

Copy link Copy Markdown

Member

See if we get the tests to pass...

@markshannon markshannon left a comment

Copy link Copy Markdown

Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks
iritkatriel reacted with thumbs up emoji

@iritkatriel iritkatriel changed the title bpo-33387: remove obsolete comment bpo-33387: update documentation for exception handling opcode changes

Jan 25, 2021

@iritkatriel iritkatriel added the docs

Documentation in the Doc dir

label

Jan 25, 2021

@markshannon markshannon merged commit dea5bf9 into python:master

Jan 26, 2021

adorilson pushed a commit to adorilson/cpython that referenced this pull request

Mar 13, 2021 
…pythonGH-24334)

* bpo-33387: remove obsolete comment

* bpo-33387: update SETUP_WITH opcode documentation

@iritkatriel iritkatriel deleted the bpo-33387 branch

March 16, 2021 13:42

@sweeneyde

Copy link Copy Markdown

Member

https://bugs.python.org/issue42167 suggests that this should be backported to 3.9

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@markshannon markshannon Awaiting requested review from markshannon

1 more reviewer

@eamanu eamanu eamanu approved these changes

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

docs

Documentation in the Doc dir

skip news

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@iritkatriel @markshannon @sweeneyde @eamanu @the-knights-who-say-ni @bedevere-bot