◐ Shell
clean mode source ↗

bpo-43837: Reverse order of precedence table to show tightly binding operators first by ammaraskar · Pull Request #25469 · python/cpython

Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in

Appearance settings

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up

Appearance settings

Conversation

@ammaraskar

@ammaraskar ammaraskar commented

Apr 19, 2021

edited by bedevere-bot

Loading

Copy link Copy Markdown

Member

As mentioned in the bug, this is an obvious improvement that makes the table more natural and brings it in-line with precedence tables from other languages.

https://bugs.python.org/issue43837

@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot added docs

Documentation in the Doc dir

awaiting review labels

Apr 19, 2021

@ammaraskar ammaraskar changed the title Reverse order of precedence table to show tightly binding operators first bpo-43837: Reverse order of precedence table to show tightly binding operators first

Apr 19, 2021

@terryjreedy terryjreedy self-requested a review

April 19, 2021 06:00

@miss-islington

Copy link Copy Markdown

Contributor

Thanks @ammaraskar for the PR, and @rhettinger for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.9.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

@bedevere-bot

Copy link Copy Markdown

GH-25472 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.9 branch.

miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request

Apr 19, 2021
…operators first (pythonGH-25469)

(cherry picked from commit 68ba0c6)

Co-authored-by: Ammar Askar <ammar@ammaraskar.com>

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@rhettinger rhettinger rhettinger approved these changes

@terryjreedy terryjreedy Awaiting requested review from terryjreedy

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

docs

Documentation in the Doc dir

skip news

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@ammaraskar @miss-islington @bedevere-bot @rhettinger @the-knights-who-say-ni