bpo-47152: Convert the re module into a package by serhiy-storchaka · Pull Request #32177 · python/cpython

Would it make sense to drop "sre_" prefix of module moved into the re package? re.sre_xxx now sounds redundant to me.

Overall, I like the approach!

Would it make sense to put an underscore prefix to "internal" sub-modules like re.sre_compile? For example, rename it to re._compile. asyncio, email and multiprocessing packages don't attempt to hide sub-modules. I don't know what's the best approach here.

The pip project now puts its whole code into a private pip._interal package: https://github.com/pypa/pip/tree/main/src/pip People used to abuse internals which was too easy to access. Now the "pip" package is a front-end only exposing the public API. In the pyperf project, all sub-modules are prefixed by an underscore: https://github.com/psf/pyperf/tree/main/pyperf In my experience, it was a good idea it since the internal API changed many times and I wanted to make sure that people don't use the internal API but only the public and tested API.