◐ Shell
clean mode source ↗

Feature/rework matcher by lwasylow · Pull Request #1076 · utPLSQL/utPLSQL

added 8 commits

June 1, 2020 21:58

jgebal

Added synonym and grant for matcher
Reworked expectation to work fine with syntax `to_( matcher() )` for to_be_within.

TODO - add tests for other matchers with `to_( matcher )` and `not_to( matcher )` syntax
…tPLSQL into feature/rework_matcher
Reorganized code so that `be_within_pct` is only supported for `number`
Added tests for non-supported syntax
Added sql-injection check.
…month

Improved error handling for null values and incompatible datatypes
Improved handling of negative dates (BC)
Improved reporting of interval text value
Improved datatypes to handle large&small precissions for timestamps

@jgebal

Added human-readable reporting of tests run-time into `ut_documentation_reporter`.

@jgebal

…n expected (not only smaller).

Updated documentation.
…nteger and cannot be used to express a decimal distace value.

Improved tests coverage for various scenarios.

@lwasylow lwasylow linked an issue

Feb 3, 2022

that may be closed by this pull request

@jgebal jgebal deleted the feature/rework_matcher branch

February 4, 2022 19:21